Highlights:
Highlights provide readers with an at-a-glance overview of the main findings of your article. Think of them as a quick snippet of the results—short and sweet. In Highlights sections, the author should provide a brief summary of the key results written as 3-5 bullets. Each Highlight must be 85 characters or fewer, including spaces, and the Highlights together must clearly convey only the results of the study.
Plain Language Summary:
In this section, you have to provide a Plain Language Summary for the article in 200-300 words. Consider that Plain Language Summary is different from abstract and it has to be written for non-specialists. To provide it, consider the following points: 1. think about your audience (e.g. journalists, science-interested public), 2. Get rid of jargon, 3. Explain what the study is about. Remember, others will need more context about what you studied, 4. Explain what you found, 5. Explain why this matters. Discuss the importance of these findings not just in terms of their implications for your field but in terms of their relevance to the public.
Authors’ contribution
In this section, you have to provide the contributor role of each author on these divisions:
Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Validation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Resources, Data Curation, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing, Visualization, Supervision, Project Administration, Funding Acquisition.
Example: Conceptualization, Author names [A, B, C, or all authors]; Methodology, Author names [A, B, C, or all authors]; Investigation, Author names [A, B, C, or all authors]; Writing – Original Draft, Author names [A, B, C, or all authors]; Writing – Review & Editing, Author names [A, B, C, or all authors]; Funding Acquisition, Author names [A, B, C, or all authors]; Resources, Author names [A, B, C, or all authors]; Supervision, Author names [A, B, C, or all authors]
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS
The PTJ is committed to apply ethics of publication, based on the COPE’s Code of Conduct and Best Practices. Also, in medical studies, PTJ has engaged to apply ethics of research, based on Declaration of Helsinki: Statement of Ethical Principles for Medical Research. So, the research’s ethical considerations must be addressed in the Materials and Methods section. For more information on the journal’s ethical principles, please refer to following links:
- PTJ’s Principles of Publishing Ethics
- PTJ’s Ethical Principles for Medical Research
Plagiarism:
The PTJ, as a journal published by Negah Institute for Scientific Communication, has accepted all terms and conditions of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) on plagiarism. So, in any case of plagiarism, which is brought to the journal editors’ attention and accompanied with convincing evidence, we act based on the COPE flowcharts and workflows. Meanwhile, to detect and prevent plagiarism in the journal articles, all submissions are checked via iTheticate software in both stages of submission and acceptance.
Conflicts of interest:
The PTJ, as a journal published by Negah Institute for Scientific Communication, is committed to apply the ICMJE recommendation on “Author Responsibilities—Conflicts of Interest in authors’ conflict of interest issues.
Authors should disclose, at the time of submission, information on financial conflicts of interest or other interests that may influence the manuscript. Authors should declare sources of funding for the work undertaken, too. So, completion and signing the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest is necessary for all authors and the articles submission won’t be accepted without filling this form.
Priority of Manuscript Consideration & Article Type Restrictions:
Due to the high volume of submissions received, priority in editorial processing and consideration may be given to manuscripts reporting Clinical Trials, Systematic Reviews, or Meta-Analyses. The journal may also prioritize high-quality Original Research articles that, in the Editors’ assessment, have the potential to make a significant contribution to the field and enhance scientific impact.
Review Articles, including Narrative Reviews and Scoping Reviews, are considered for publication only when specifically invited or commissioned by the Editor-in-Chief. Unsolicited Review Articles submitted without prior invitation will not proceed to external peer review.
Invitations for Review Articles are issued at the discretion of the Editor-in-Chief based on the journal’s editorial priorities and the expertise of the invited authors.
Note: Invitations for Review Articles are issued at the sole discretion of the Editor-in-Chief to leading experts in specific fields.
Instructions for citing AI-generated content
Chatbots (such as ChatGPT) should not be mentioned as authors because they are unable to take responsibility for the accuracy, verification, and originality of the work, which are essential for authorship. Therefore, humans are responsible for any content that uses AI-assisted technologies.
Authors should carefully review and edit results generated by AI because AI may provide output that appears reliable but is inaccurate, incomplete, or distorted. They should also ensure that no plagiarism has occurred in their article, either in the text or in the AI-generated images.
Acknowledge your AI usage on your references page or in another location specified by your instructor. Your acknowledgement should include the following:
- Name of the AI tool(s) you used
- Link to the AI tool(s) you used or, if available, a link to the AI chat transcript(s)
- Description of how or why you used generative AI
- The prompt(s) you submitted to the AI tool, if applicable
- Explanation of how you incorporated the AI's output/response into your finished product
Use and adapt this statement to acknowledge your use of generative AI tools:
I acknowledge the use of [name of AI tool(s) and link(s)] to [describe why or how you used generative AI]. I used the following prompt: [list of prompts]. The output from these prompts was used to [explain use].
Example 1:
I acknowledge the use of Grammarly (https://www.grammarly.com/) to improve the organization and academic tone of my essay. The output was used to revise my draft essay. I used the suggestions to reorder some content and break up other sections of text to improve organization and the overall tone of the essay.
Example 2:
I acknowledge the use of ChatGPT (https://chatgpt.com/share/685061c9-abc4-8009-b0a0-63b08142e6c2) to revise the flow and transitions between paragraphs of my essay. I used the following prompts:
- Original prompt: Read my attached essay and help me improve my transitions between paragraphs.
- Follow-up prompt: I've already written "In contrast" a lot. Please suggest different transition phrases I can use.
General recommendations for citing AI-generated content and using AI tools to create citations:
- Cite the outputs of generative AI tools when you use them in your work. Include a citation every time you directly quote, paraphrase, or summarize a response from a generative AI tools such as ChatGPT and Grammarly
- Do not rely on sources cited by generative AI tools without reading those sources yourself. AI tools are notorious for making up citations, sharing broken links, and citing sources that do not confirm the information shared in their responses. Always go to a source yourself to verify its existence and to evaluate the information or perspectives it shares.
- If you use AI tools to generate citations, make sure those citations are correctly formatted. Several generative AI tools, like ChatGPT or Grammarly, can help you create citations for sources you find in your research. Be sure to compare these citations with the official style guidelines to ensure they are correct.
- Be flexible in your approaches to citing AI-generated content. Official style guidelines are still emerging and are likely to change as AI technologies continue to evolve. If you are unsure how to cite something generated by AI, contact the library, consult with your instructor, and include a note in your writing that describes how you used a certain tool.
Vancover Style
| Material Type
|
Reference List Example (based on Citing Medicine 2nd edition)
|
EndNote (Citing Medicine) Instructions
Based on using the Citing Medicine 2 (UWA) style with EndNote 20 and 21 |
Software
(e.g. ChatGPT) |
1. OpenAI. ChatGPT [Computer Software] 2023 [Cited 2023 Feb 15]. Available from: https://chat.openai.com.
Acknowledge and describe your use of the generative AI within your work by using the following recommended intext conventions:
As generated by the generative AI program (ChatGPT, 2023)
According to ChatGPT (2023) there is a strong correlation between diabetes and obesity...
.. |
If using EndNote select:
Reference Type - Online Database
Author - Company name, e.g. OpenAI
Year - Year the search was run
Title - Product name followed by [Computer Software], e.g. ChatGPT [Computer Software]
Date Accessed - Type in "Cited" and then the date, e.g. Cited 2023 Feb 15
URL - Copy and paste. |
Please note: The information in this guide is subject to change as guidance on referencing AI tools continues to evolve.
This Generative AI referencing sample has been adapted from Citing Medicine: the NLM Style Guide using the examples for citing Computer Programs, Databases, and Datasets.