سه شنبه 6 آذر 1403
دوره 8، شماره 2 - ( 4-1397 )
جلد 8 شماره 2 صفحات 114-107 |
برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Zarei M, Rahmani N. The Relationship Between Dynamic Stability and Functional Movement Screening Test . PTJ 2018; 8 (2) :107-114
URL: http://ptj.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-363-fa.html
URL: http://ptj.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-363-fa.html
The Relationship Between Dynamic Stability and Functional Movement Screening Test . فصلنامه فیزیک درمانی. 1397; 8 (2) :107-114
چکیده: (4801 مشاهده)
Purpose: Recently, the Functional Movement Screen (FMS) and Y Balance Tests are used to assess the key movement patterns, dynamic stability and to identify individuals at high risk of injury. But, there are few studies to assess the relationship between the FMS test and Y Balance Test. This study aimed to assess the relationship between dynamic stability and the FMS test.
Methods: The subjects of this study were 95 students (Mean±SD age=26.7±3.13 y, Mean±SD height=177.4±6.9 cm, Mean±SD weight=72.02±6.91 kg, and Mean±SD BMI=22.93±0.41 kg/m2) from a university complex. All subjects were evaluated prior to the onset of training. Y Balance Test was used to evaluate dynamic stability and FMS test for evaluating the movement patterns of the subjects.
Results: The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to assess the relationship between variables. The results showed a significant association between the FMS score and the aggregate Y score (r=0.205, P=0.04). Also, there was a weak correlation between FMS and normalized posteromedial reach (r=0.27, P=0.04). However, the correlation between FMS and normalized anterior reach and posterolateral reach was not statistically significant (P>0.05).
Conclusion: These findings demonstrate partial correspondence between the two tests. However, the relationship is not strong enough to consider them interchangeable. Thus, dynamic postural control is not a large component of the aggregate FMS score.
Methods: The subjects of this study were 95 students (Mean±SD age=26.7±3.13 y, Mean±SD height=177.4±6.9 cm, Mean±SD weight=72.02±6.91 kg, and Mean±SD BMI=22.93±0.41 kg/m2) from a university complex. All subjects were evaluated prior to the onset of training. Y Balance Test was used to evaluate dynamic stability and FMS test for evaluating the movement patterns of the subjects.
Results: The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to assess the relationship between variables. The results showed a significant association between the FMS score and the aggregate Y score (r=0.205, P=0.04). Also, there was a weak correlation between FMS and normalized posteromedial reach (r=0.27, P=0.04). However, the correlation between FMS and normalized anterior reach and posterolateral reach was not statistically significant (P>0.05).
Conclusion: These findings demonstrate partial correspondence between the two tests. However, the relationship is not strong enough to consider them interchangeable. Thus, dynamic postural control is not a large component of the aggregate FMS score.
فهرست منابع
1. McCunn R, aus der Fünten K, Fullagar HH, McKeown I, Meyer T. Reliability and association with injury of movement screens: A critical review. Sports Medicine. 2016; 46(6):763-81. [DOI:10.1007/s40279-015-0453-1] [PMID] [DOI:10.1007/s40279-015-0453-1]
2. Cook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom B. Pre-participation screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function-part 1. North American Journal of Sports Physical Therapy. 2006; 1(2):62-72. [PMID] [PMID] [PMCID]
3. O'connor FG, Deuster PA, Davis J, Pappas CG, Knapik JJ. Functional Movement Screening: Predicting injuries in officer candidates. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2011; 43(12):2224-30. [DOI:10.1249/MSS.0b013e318223522d] [PMID] [DOI:10.1249/MSS.0b013e318223522d]
4. Kiesel K, Plisky P, Butler R. Functional movement test scores improve following a standardized off‐season intervention program in professional football players. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports. 2011; 21(2):287-92. [DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.01038.x] [PMID] [DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.01038.x]
5. Kiesel K, Plisky PJ, Voight ML. Can serious injury in professional football be predicted by a preseason Functional Movement Screen. North American Journal of Sports Physical Therapy. 2007; 2(3):147-58. [PMID] [PMID] [PMCID]
6. Peate W, Bates G, Lunda K, Francis S, Bellamy K. Core strength: A new model for injury prediction and prevention. Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology. 2007; 2(3):1-9. [DOI:10.1186/1745-6673-2-3] [DOI:10.1186/1745-6673-2-3]
7. Zarei M, Asady Samani Z, Reisi J. [Can Functional Movement Screening predict injuries in Iranian soldiers? (Persian)]. Journal of Military Medicine. 2015; 17(2):107-14.
8. Cook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom BJ, Voight M. Functional Movement Screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function-part 2. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy. 2014; 9(4):396-409. [PMCID] [PMID] [PMID] [PMCID]
9. Sorenson EA. Functional Movement Screen as a predictor of injury in high school basketball athletes [PhD. dissertation]. Oregon: University of Oregon; 2009.
10. Gribble PA, Hertel J, Plisky P. Using the Star Excursion Balance Test to assess dynamic postural-control deficits and outcomes in lower extremity injury: A literature and systematic review. Journal of Athletic Training. 2012; 47(3):339-57. [DOI:10.4085/1062-6050-47.3.08] [PMID] [PMCID] [DOI:10.4085/1062-6050-47.3.08]
11. Plisky PJ, Gorman PP, Butler RJ, Kiesel KB, Underwood FB, Elkins B. The reliability of an instrumented device for measuring components of the Star Excursion Balance Test. North American Journal of Sports Physical Therapy. 2009; 4(2):92-99. [PMID] [PMID] [PMCID]
12. Cook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom B. Pre-participation screening: The use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function–Part 2. North American Journal of Sports Physical Therapy. 2006; 1(3):132-9. [PMID] [PMID] [PMCID]
13. Cook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom BJ, Voight M. Functional Movement Screening: The use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function-part 2. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy. 2014; 9(4):396-409. [PMCID] [PMID] [PMID] [PMCID]
14. Engquist KD, Smith CA, Chimera NJ, Warren M. Performance comparison of student-athletes and general college students on the Functional Movement Screen and the Y Balance Test. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2015; 29(8):2296-303. [DOI:10.1519/JSC.0000000000000906] [PMID] [DOI:10.1519/JSC.0000000000000906]
15. Chimera NJ, Smith CA, Warren M. Injury history, sex, and performance on the Functional Movement Screen and Y Balance Test. Journal of Athletic Training. 2015; 50(5):475-85. [DOI:10.4085/1062-6050-49.6.02] [PMID] [PMCID] [DOI:10.4085/1062-6050-49.6.02]
16. Teyhen DS, Riebel MA, McArthur DR, Savini M, Jones MJ, Goffar SL, et al. Normative data and the influence of age and gender on power, balance, flexibility, and functional movement in healthy service members. Military Medicine. 2014; 179(4):413-20. [DOI:10.7205/MILMED-D-13-00362] [PMID] [DOI:10.7205/MILMED-D-13-00362]
17. Kelleher LK, Frayne RJ, Beach TA, Higgs JM, Johnson AM, Dickey JP. Relationships between the Functional Movement Screen score and y-balance test reach distances. International Journal of Human Movement and Sports Sciences. 2017; 5(3):51-6. [DOI:10.13189/saj.2017.050302] [DOI:10.13189/saj.2017.050302]
18. Scudamore EM, Stevens SL, Fuller DK, Coons JM, Morgan DW. Use of Functional Movement Screen scores to predict dynamic balance in physically active men and women. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2018; p:1064-8011. [DOI:10.1519/JSC.0000000000002829] [PMID] [DOI:10.1519/JSC.0000000000002829]
19. Chorba RS, Chorba DJ, Bouillon LE, Overmyer CA, Landis JA. Use of a functional movement screening tool to determine injury risk in female collegiate athletes. North American Journal of Sports Physical Therapy (NAJSPT). 2010; 5(2):47-54. [PMCID] [PMID] [PMID] [PMCID]
20. O'connor FG, Deuster PA, Davis J, Pappas CG, Knapik JJ. Functional Movement Screening: Predicting injuries in officer candidates. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2011; 43(12):2224-30. [DOI:10.1249/MSS.0b013e318223522d] [PMID] [DOI:10.1249/MSS.0b013e318223522d]
21. Zarei M, Asady Samani Z, Reisi J. [Can Functional Movement Screening predict injuries in Iranian soldiers? (Persian)]. Journal of Military Medicine. 2015; 17(2):107-14.
22. Hertel J, Braham RA, Hale SA, Olmsted-Kramer LC. Simplifying the Star Excursion Balance Test: Analyses of subjects with and without chronic ankle instability. The Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy. 2006; 36(3):131-7. [DOI:10.2519/jospt.2006.36.3.131] [PMID] [DOI:10.2519/jospt.2006.36.3.131]
23. Olmsted LC, Carcia CR, Hertel J, Shultz SJ. Efficacy of the Star Excursion Balance Tests in detecting reach deficits in subjects with chronic ankle instability. Journal of Athletic Training. 2002; 37(4):501. [PMID] [PMCID] [PMID] [PMCID]
24. Clark RC, Saxion CE, Cameron KL, Gerber JP. Associations between three clinical assessment tools for postural stability. North American Journal of Sports Physical Therapy. 2010; 5(3):122-30. [PMID] [PMCID] [PMID] [PMCID]
25. Plisky PJ, Rauh MJ, Kaminski TW, Underwood FB. Star Excursion Balance Test as a predictor of lower extremity injury in high school basketball players. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 2006; 36(12):911-9. [DOI:10.2519/jospt.2006.2244] [PMID] [DOI:10.2519/jospt.2006.2244]
26. Hertel J, Miller S, Denegar C. Intratester and intertester reliability during the Star Excursion Balance Tests. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation. 2000; 9(2):104-16. [DOI:10.1123/jsr.9.2.104] [DOI:10.1123/jsr.9.2.104]
27. Chan Y. Biostatistics 104: Correlational analysis. Singapore Medical Journal. 2003; 44(12):614-9. [PMID] [PMID]
28. Lockie RG, Callaghan SJ, Jordan CA, Luczo TM, Jeffriess MD, Jalilvand F, et al. Certain actions from the Functional Movement Screen do not provide an indication of dynamic stability. Journal of Human Kinetics. 2015; 47(1):19-29. [DOI:10.1515/hukin-2017-0109] [PMID] [PMCID] [DOI:10.1515/hukin-2017-0109]
29. Lockie RG, Schultz AB, Callaghan SJ, Jordan C, Luczo T, Jeffriess MD. A preliminary investigation into the relationship between Functional Movement Screen scores and athletic physical performance in female team sport athletes. Biology of Sport. 2015; 32(1):41-51. [DOI:10.5604/20831862.1127281] [PMID] [PMCID] [DOI:10.5604/20831862.1127281]
30. Kazman JB, Galecki JM, Lisman P, Deuster PA, O'Connor FG. Factor structure of the Functional Movement Screen in marine officer candidates. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2014; 28(3):672-8. [DOI:10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182a6dd83] [PMID] [DOI:10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182a6dd83]
31. Koehle MS, Saffer BY, Sinnen NM, MacInnis MJ. Factor structure and internal validity of the Functional Movement Screen in adults. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2016; 30(2):540-6. [DOI:10.1519/JSC.0000000000001092] [PMID] [DOI:10.1519/JSC.0000000000001092]
32. Li Y, Wang X, Chen X, Dai B. Exploratory factor analysis of the Functional Movement Screen in elite athletes. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2015; 33(11):1166-72. [DOI:10.1080/02640414.2014.986505] [PMID] [DOI:10.1080/02640414.2014.986505]
33. Butler RJ, Plisky PJ, Kiesel KB. Interrater reliability of videotaped performance on the Functional Movement Screen using the 100-point scoring scale. Athletic Training and Sports Health Care. 2012; 4(3):103-9. [DOI:10.3928/19425864-20110715-01] [DOI:10.3928/19425864-20110715-01]
34. Frost DM, Beach TA, Callaghan JP, McGill SM. Using the Functional Movement Screen™ to evaluate the effectiveness of training. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2012; 26(6):1620-30. [DOI:10.1519/JSC.0b013e318234ec59] [PMID] [DOI:10.1519/JSC.0b013e318234ec59]
35. Beckham SG, Harper M. Functional training: Fad or here to stay. ACSM's Health & Fitness Journal. 2010; 14(6):24-30. [DOI:10.1249/FIT.0b013e3181f8b3b7] [DOI:10.1249/FIT.0b013e3181f8b3b7]
| بازنشر اطلاعات | |
 |
این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است. |
