دوره 7، شماره 2 - ( 4-1396 )
جلد 7 شماره 2 صفحات 78-71 |
برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
1- دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان
چکیده: (5103 مشاهده)
Purpose: Forward Walking (FW) and Backward Walking (BW) on different gradients of the treadmill is a common exercise for lower extremity rehabilitation. However, limited studies are found about the three-dimensional analysis of lower extremity and status of the knee joint during FW and BW on different gradients. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the lower extremity joints kinematics during FW and BW on incline and decline surfaces.
Methods: The current research has a quasi-experimental design. Sixteen healthy males with the mean (SD) age of 22.4(2.5) years, volunteered to participate in this study. The subjects’ FW and BW with their preferred speed on a treadmill at four gradients (-7.5%, 0%, +5% and +10%), were analyzed by using motion capture system. All data were analyzed using paired sample t test (P<0.05).
Results: Significant differences were seen between FW and BW in most angular variables in sagittal plane. However, there were no significant differences between FW and BW in most parameters of knee angle in frontal plane.
Conclusion: Based on the results, with increase in FW inclination and decrease in BW inclination, the knee varus angle in frontal plane reduces. Therefore, FW on the upslope surfaces or BW on downslope surfaces, probably is a suitable solution to reduce the loads exerted on medial compartment of the knee.
فهرست منابع
1. Chaloupka EC, Kang J, Mastrangelo MA, Donnelly MS. Cardiorespiratory and metabolic responses during forward and backward walking. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 1997; 25(5):302–6. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1997.25.5.302 [DOI:10.2519/jospt.1997.25.5.302]
2. Cipriani DJ, Armstrong CW, Gaul S. Backward walking at three levels of treadmill inclination: An electromyographic and kinematic analysis. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 1995; 22(3):95–102. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1995.22.3.95 [DOI:10.2519/jospt.1995.22.3.95]
3. Hooper TL, Dunn DM, Props JE, Bruce BA, Sawyer SF, Daniel JA. The effects of graded forward and backward walking on heart rate and oxygen consumption. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 2004; 34(2):65–71. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2004.34.2.65 [DOI:10.2519/jospt.2004.34.2.65]
4. Terblanche E, Venter R. The effect of backward training on the speed, agility and power of netball players. South African Journal for Research in Sport, Physical Education and Recreation. 2009; 31(2):135-45. doi: 10.4314/sajrs.v31i2.46335 [DOI:10.4314/sajrs.v31i2.46335]
5. Threlkeld AJ, Horn TS, Wojtowicz GM, Rooney JG, Shapiro R. Pilot study: Kinematics, ground reaction force, and muscle balance produced by backward running. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 1989; 11(2):56–63. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1989.11.2.56 [DOI:10.2519/jospt.1989.11.2.56]
6. Franz JR, Kram R. The effects of grade and speed on leg muscle activations during walking. Gait & Posture. 2012; 35(1):143–7. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.08.025 [DOI:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.08.025]
7. Silder A, Besier T, Delp SL. Predicting the metabolic cost of incline walking from muscle activity and walking mechanics. Journal of Biomechanics. 2012; 45(10):1842–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.03.032 [DOI:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.03.032]
8. Ehlen KA, Reiser RFI, Browning RC. Energetics and biomechanics of inclined treadmill walking in obese adults. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2011; 43(7):1251–9. doi: 10.1249/mss.0b013e3182098a6c [DOI:10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182098a6c]
9. Haggerty M, Dickin DC, Popp J, Wang H. The influence of incline walking on joint mechanics. Gait & Posture. 2014; 39(4):1017–21. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.12.027 [DOI:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.12.027]
10. Naderi S, Mohammadipour F, Amir Seyfaddini M. The effects of different walking inclinations on knee angle in the frontal plane of patients with varus malalignment. Physical Treatments-Specific Physical Therapy Journal. 2014; 4(3):139-44.
11. Andriacchi TP. Dynamics of knee malalignment. The Orthopedic clinics of North America. 1994; 25(3):395-403. PMID: 8028883 [PMID]
12. Hurwitz DE, Sumner DR, Andriacchi TP, Sugar DA. Dynamic knee loads during gait predict proximal tibial bone distribution. Journal of Biomechanics. 1998; 31(5):423–30. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9290(98)00028-1 [DOI:10.1016/S0021-9290(98)00028-1]
13. Sharma L. The role of knee alignment in disease progression and functional decline in knee osteoarthritis. JAMA. 2001; 286(2):188. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.2.188 [DOI:10.1001/jama.286.2.188]
14. Schipplein OD, Andriacchi TP. Interaction between active and passive knee stabilizers during level walking. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 1991; 9(1):113–9. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100090114 [DOI:10.1002/jor.1100090114]
15. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods. 2007; 39(2):175–91. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146 [DOI:10.3758/BF03193146]
16. Werner C, Lindquist AR, Bardeleben A, Hesse S. The influence of treadmill inclination on the gait of ambulatory hemiparetic subjects. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair. 2007; 21(1):76–80. doi: 10.1177/1545968306289958 [DOI:10.1177/1545968306289958]
17. Munro A, Herrington L, Comfort P. Comparison of landing knee valgus angle between female basketball and football athletes: Possible implications for anterior cruciate ligament and patellofemoral joint injury rates. Physical Therapy in Sport. 2012; 13(4):259–64. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2012.01.005 [DOI:10.1016/j.ptsp.2012.01.005]
18. Rodenbusch TLM, Ribeiro TS, Simão CR, Britto HMJS, Tudella E, Lindquist AR. Effects of treadmill inclination on the gait of children with down syndrome. Research in Developmental Disabilities. 2013; 34(7):2185–90. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.02.014 [DOI:10.1016/j.ridd.2013.02.014]
19. Moreno CC, Mendes LA, Lindquist AR. Effects of treadmill inclination on the gait of individuals with chronic hemiparesis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2011; 92(10):1675–80. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.05.016 [DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2011.05.016]
20. Tulchin K, Orendurff M, Karol L. The effects of surface slope on multi-segment foot kinematics in healthy adults. Gait & Posture. 2010; 32(4):446–50. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.06.008 [DOI:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.06.008]
21. Chung MJ, Wang MJJ. The change of gait parameters during walking at different percentage of preferred walking speed for healthy adults aged 20–60 years. Gait & Posture. 2010; 31(1):131–5. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.09.013 [DOI:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.09.013]
22. Zeni JA, Richards JG, Higginson JS. Two simple methods for determining gait events during treadmill and overground walking using kinematic data. Gait & Posture. 2008; 27(4):710–4. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.07.007 [DOI:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.07.007]
23. Lee M, Kim J, Son J, Kim Y. Kinematic and kinetic analysis during forward and backward walking. Gait & Posture. 2013; 38(4):674–8. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.02.014 [DOI:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.02.014]
24. Tetsworth K, Paley D. Malalignment and degenerative arthropathy. Orthopedic Clinics of North America. 1994; 25(3):367-77. PMID: 8028880 [PMID]
25. Brouwer GM, Tol AWV, Bergink AP, Belo JN, Bernsen RMD, Reijman M, et al. Association between valgus and varus alignment and the development and progression of radiographic osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthritis & Rheumatism. 2007; 56(4):1204–11. doi: 10.1002/art.22515 [DOI:10.1002/art.22515]
26. Han JT, Kwon YH, Park JW, Koo HM, Nam KS. Three-dimensional kinematic analysis during upslope walking with different inclinations by healthy adults. Journal of Physical Therapy Science. 2009; 21(4):385–91. doi: 10.1589/jpts.21.385 [DOI:10.1589/jpts.21.385]
| بازنشر اطلاعات | |
 |
این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است. |