Volume 6, Number 2 (Summer 2016 -- 2017) | PTJ 2017, 6(2): 79-84 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Askary Ashtiani A R, Ghiasi F, Noraie K M, Khodadadi Bohloli B. Effectiveness of Action Potential Simulation and Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on Pain and Function of Patients With Chronic Mechanical Shoulder Impairment. PTJ. 2017; 6 (2) :79-84
URL: http://ptj.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-250-en.html

1- Assistant Professor Health Promotion Research Center, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran.
2- Assistant Professor Department of Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran.
3- Lecturer Department of Physical Education, Faculty of Human Science, Saravan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Saravan, Iran.
4- Master of Science student Department of Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran.
Abstract:   (223 Views)

Purpose: Rehabilitation and physiotherapy have a major role in reducing the pain and increasing the functional ability in patients with shoulder joint pain. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of Action Potential Simulation (APS) and Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) in patients with Chronic Mechanical Shoulder Pain (CMSP). 
Methods: In this quasi-experimental study, 32 patients with CMSP were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned into APS group and TENS group, both of them received 6 sessions of intervention. The study instruments included pain intensity and shoulder Range Of Motion (ROM), America Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, and Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index. The stability of scapula and shoulder function (shoulder dyskinesia) were measured before and after the intervention. The obtained data were analyzed using t tests by SPSS19 (P<0.05).
Results: Pain intensity, shoulder ROM, and stability of scapula decreased in both groups. However, there were no significant differences between groups (P>0.05). In addition, shoulder function did not change after intervention in both groups (P>0.05). 
Conclusion: With regard to study findings, APS and TENS are effective in pain reduction but none has preference over the other in treatment approaches.

Full-Text [PDF 491 kb]   (55 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2016/02/5 | Accepted: 2016/06/2 | Published: 2016/07/1

Add your comments about this article : Your username or email:
Write the security code in the box

Send email to the article author


© 2015 All Rights Reserved | Physical Treatments - Specific Physical Therapy Journal

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb